MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER VS JORDAN OLDER

MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER vs JORDAN OLDER

MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER vs JORDAN OLDER

Blog Article

In the case of *Major League Soccer L.L.C. v. Jordan Older* (Opposition Case No. 91240089), MLS filed an opposition on 16 March 2018 against the trademark application filed by Jordan Older for the mark “LOS ANGELES F.C.” under Serial No. 86335507. While MLS challenged the application, Jordan Older eventually decided to voluntarily withdraw his trademark after it was published for opposition, with the application marked as “Abandoned – Express After Publication.”

The case, heard by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), was part of the usual practice in trademark law, where large companies, such as Major League Soccer, aim to safeguard their brand by opposing smaller applications. Jordan Older, despite the opposition from MLS, succeeded to avoid a lengthy legal conflict by deciding to abandon the application on his own terms, thus avoiding likely expensive and drawn-out litigation.

The opposition was supervised by Interlocutory Attorney Jennifer Krisp, with paralegal support from Nicole M. Thier. To begin, a notice was issued, and trial dates were set, with an answer due from Older by April 25, 2018. However, the matter was quickly settled on 5 April 2018, when the case was closed and terminated. The immediate conclusion suggests that Jordan Older efficiently navigated the complexities of the opposition read more process by choosing to abandon the mark, settling the case before any substantive legal disputes occurred.

This resolution demonstrates Older’s capability to resolve the matter quickly, sidestepping what could have been an arduous legal dispute from a major sports entity. His decision to willingly abandon the mark emphasises his strategic approach, letting him to bypass the financial burdens and protracted proceedings typical in trademark disputes. While Major League Soccer’s opposition never attained a formal resolution through the TTAB, this case illustrates how individual applicants can take cautious legal decisions to avoid conflicts with major entities without entering into lengthy litigation.

This spintax format allows for different versions of the text to be generated by replacing the bracketed terms.

Report this page